<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Site5 Reviews &#38; Site5 Coupon Discount $3.46/mth - Site 5 Hosted &#187; Site5 Downtime</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.site5review.org/site5/site5-downtime/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.site5review.org</link>
	<description>Real Site5 reviews and Site5 user reviews that you must read before sign up Site5.com hosting. Site5 coupon code and site5 promo code for special discount up to $118 dollars for your site5 shared hosting, site5 reseller and site5 dedicated server. Site 5 review from forums, blogs, and user submitted. This site5 blog is also about site5 coupons, site5 discounts, site5 rebates, and site5 promotion.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 16:30:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Site5 uptime for november 2008 &#8211; www.site5review.org</title>
		<link>http://www.site5review.org/site5-uptime-for-november-2008-wwwsite5revieworg</link>
		<comments>http://www.site5review.org/site5-uptime-for-november-2008-wwwsite5revieworg#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 17:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Site5 Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Site5 Downtime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site5 Problem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site5 Uptime]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.site5review.org/?p=95</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Site5 uptime for november 2008 : 99.252% over the Internet. Source by www.site5review.org Site5 uptime was lower than 99.9% uptime for this november. As per monitoring, there were major downtime detected on 9th of the month, which last for 100 minutes long, that is almost one and half an hour of service downtime. Other than [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Site5 uptime for november 2008 :</strong> 99.252% over the Internet. Source by www.site5review.org</p>
<p>Site5 uptime was lower than 99.9% uptime for this november. As per monitoring, there were major downtime detected on 9th of the month, which last for 100 minutes long, that is almost one and half an hour of service downtime. Other than that, site 5 server response time was very slow over the month, recording only 0.464 second only. This indicating the server is not fast, and might be having some problems.</p>
<p>Site 5 uptime for this month is rather week, compare site5 uptim with other major web hosting providers&#8217; uptime:<br />
<a href="http://www.hostgatorreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>hostgator</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.fatcowreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>fatcow</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.hostmonsterreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>hostmonster</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.ixwebhostingreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>ixwebhosting</strong></a>,  <a href="http://www.lunarpagesreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>lunarpages</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.bluehostreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>bluehost</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.webhostingpadreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>webhostingpad</strong></a>,  <strong><a href="http://www.fastdomainreview.org/" target="_self">fastdomain</a></strong>, <a href="http://www.powwebreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>powweb</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.dot5hostingreviews.org/" target="_self"><strong>dot5 hosting</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.ipowerwebreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>ipower</strong></a>,  <a href="http://www.eukhostreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>eukhost</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.a2hostingreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>a2 hosting</strong></a> etc.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a title="Site5 Uptime" href="http://www.site5review.org/site5.php" target="_self"><img class="aligncenter" title="Site5 Uptime" src="http://www.site5review.org/images/site5-uptime-november-2008.gif" alt="" width="584" height="689" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.site5review.org/site5-uptime-for-november-2008-wwwsite5revieworg/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Site5 uptime for july 2008 suck!</title>
		<link>http://www.site5review.org/site5-uptime-for-july-2008-suck</link>
		<comments>http://www.site5review.org/site5-uptime-for-july-2008-suck#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 14:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Site5 Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Site5 Downtime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site5 Problem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site5 Sucks?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site5 Uptime]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.site5review.org/?p=71</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Site5 uptime for july 2008: 99.56% over the Internet site5 uptime for july 2008 really suck, recorded at 99.5% uptime level, with almost 0.5% of service downtime. Over 17 downtime/problem occurance detected over the month, and with almost 200 minutes of service downtime recorded. The site5 server response time was slow, recorded at only 0.426 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Site5 uptime for july 2008:</strong> 99.56% over the Internet</p>
<p>site5 uptime for july 2008 really suck, recorded at 99.5% uptime level, with almost 0.5% of service downtime. Over 17 downtime/problem occurance detected over the month, and with almost 200 minutes of service downtime recorded.</p>
<p>The site5 server response time was slow, recorded at only 0.426 second. A really slow hosting server. Compare site5 server performance with other web hosting providers: <a href="http://www.fatcowreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>fatcow</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.hostgatorreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>hostgator</strong></a>,  <a href="http://www.hostmonsterreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>hostmonster</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.ixwebhostingreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>ixwebhosting</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.bluehostreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>bluehost</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.lunarpagesreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>lunarpages</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.webhostingpadreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>webhostingpad</strong></a>,  <strong><a href="http://www.fastdomainreview.org/" target="_self">fastdomain</a></strong>, <a href="http://www.powwebreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>powweb</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.eukhostreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>eukhost</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.a2hostingreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>a2 hosting</strong></a>,  <a href="http://www.dot5hostingreviews.org/" target="_self"><strong>dot5 hosting</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.ipowerwebreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>ipower</strong></a> etc.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a title="Site5 Uptime" href="http://www.site5review.org/site5.php" target="_self"><img class="aligncenter" title="Site5 Uptime" src="http://www.site5review.org/images/site5-uptime-july-2008.gif" alt="" width="582" height="689" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.site5review.org/site5-uptime-for-july-2008-suck/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Site5 uptime for JUNE 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.site5review.org/site5-uptime-for-june-2008</link>
		<comments>http://www.site5review.org/site5-uptime-for-june-2008#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 18:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Site5 Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Site5 Downtime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site5 Uptime]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.site5review.org/?p=67</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Site5 uptime for JUNE 2008: 99.696% over the Internet For the month of JUNE 2008, site5 uptime recorded as 99.696% over the Internet, with 9 outage detected over the month, and with average server response time of 0.612 second. This month site5 uptime is better is compare with previous month site 5 uptime. and we [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Site5 uptime for JUNE 2008: 99.696% over the Internet</strong></p>
<p>For the month of JUNE 2008, site5 uptime recorded as 99.696% over the Internet, with 9 outage detected over the month, and with average server response time of 0.612 second.</p>
<p>This month site5 uptime is better is compare with previous month site 5 uptime. and we hope to see much better uptime in following month.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.site5review.org/site5.php" target="_blank"><img style="border: 1px solid black;" src="http://www.site5review.org/images/site5-uptime-jun-2008.gif" alt="Site5 uptime jun 2008" width="587" height="704" /></a></p>
<p>Go to <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><a title="Site5" href="http://www.site5review.org/site5.php" target="_blank">Site5.com</a></strong></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.site5review.org/site5-uptime-for-june-2008/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Site5 uptime for april 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.site5review.org/site5-uptime-for-april-2008</link>
		<comments>http://www.site5review.org/site5-uptime-for-april-2008#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 07:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Site5 Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Site5 Downtime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site5 Uptime]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.site5review.org/?p=61</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Site5 uptime for april 2008: 99.452% over the internet Site5 uptime is rather low for this april 2008, similar with march 2008. Over the month, several server downtime had been detected, and total of 19 server outage recorded. There are few server reboot over the month too, not sure its caused by downtime or by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Site5 uptime for april 2008: 99.452% over the internet</p>
<p>Site5 uptime is rather low for this april 2008, similar with march 2008. Over the month, several server downtime had been detected, and total of 19 server outage recorded. There are few server reboot over the month too, not sure its caused by downtime or by server maintenance.</p>
<p>The server average response time is 0.709 second. Similar with march response time too.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" style="border: 1px solid black;" src="http://www.site5review.org/images/site5-uptime-april-2008.gif" alt="site5 uptime april 2008" width="588" height="699" /></p>
<p>Go to <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><a title="Site5" href="http://www.site5review.org/site5.php" target="_blank">Site5.com</a></strong></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.site5review.org/site5-uptime-for-april-2008/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Site5 uptime for march 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.site5review.org/site5-uptime-for-march-2008</link>
		<comments>http://www.site5review.org/site5-uptime-for-march-2008#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 06:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Site5 Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Site5 Downtime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site5 Uptime]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.site5review.org/?p=59</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Site5 uptime for march 2008: 99.486% over the Internet For the month of march, site5 uptime is not as good as previous month. On 13th &#38; 14th of the month, the site5 server had experienced some service downtime and interuption, that had caused the site not accessible for some time. For the remaining days, site5 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Site5 uptime for march 2008: 99.486% over the Internet</p>
<p>For the month of march, site5 uptime is not as good as previous month. On 13th &amp; 14th of the month, the site5 server had experienced some service downtime and interuption, that had caused the site not accessible for some time. For the remaining days, site5 uptime recorded as 100%.</p>
<p>For the site5 server average response time, its recorded at 0.687 second.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.site5review.org/site5.php" target="_blank"><img class="aligncenter" style="border: 1px solid black;" src="http://www.site5review.org/images/site5-uptime-march-2008.gif" alt="site5 uptime march 2008" width="586" height="684" /></a></p>
<p>Go to <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><a title="Site5" href="http://www.site5review.org/site5.php" target="_blank">Site5.com</a></strong></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.site5review.org/site5-uptime-for-march-2008/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
