<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Site5 Reviews &#38; Site5 Coupon Discount $3.46/mth - Site 5 Hosted &#187; Site5 Problem</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.site5review.org/site5/site5-problem/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.site5review.org</link>
	<description>Real Site5 reviews and Site5 user reviews that you must read before sign up Site5.com hosting. Site5 coupon code and site5 promo code for special discount up to $118 dollars for your site5 shared hosting, site5 reseller and site5 dedicated server. Site 5 review from forums, blogs, and user submitted. This site5 blog is also about site5 coupons, site5 discounts, site5 rebates, and site5 promotion.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 16:18:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Site5 uptime for november 2008 &#8211; www.site5review.org</title>
		<link>http://www.site5review.org/site5-uptime-for-november-2008-wwwsite5revieworg</link>
		<comments>http://www.site5review.org/site5-uptime-for-november-2008-wwwsite5revieworg#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 17:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Site5 Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Site5 Downtime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site5 Problem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site5 Uptime]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.site5review.org/?p=95</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Site5 uptime for november 2008 : 99.252% over the Internet. Source by www.site5review.org
Site5 uptime was lower than 99.9% uptime for this november. As per monitoring, there were major downtime detected on 9th of the month, which last for 100 minutes long, that is almost one and half an hour of service downtime. Other than that, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a title="Site5 uptime" href="http://www.site5review.org/site5/site5-uptime">Site5 uptime</a> for november 2008 :</strong> 99.252% over the Internet. Source by www.site5review.org</p>
<p><a title="Site5" href="http://www.site5review.org/">Site5</a> uptime was lower than 99.9% uptime for this november. As per monitoring, there were major downtime detected on 9th of the month, which last for 100 minutes long, that is almost one and half an hour of service downtime. Other than that, <a title="site 5 server" href="http://www.site5review.org/site5/site5-servers">site 5 server</a> response time was very slow over the month, recording only 0.464 second only. This indicating the server is not fast, and might be having some problems.</p>
<p><a title="Site 5 uptime" href="http://www.site5review.org/site5/site5-uptime">Site 5 uptime</a> for this month is rather week, compare site5 uptim with other major web hosting providers&#8217; uptime:<br />
<a href="http://www.hostgatorreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>hostgator</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.fatcowreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>fatcow</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.hostmonsterreview.org/" target="_self"><strong><a title="hostmonster" href="http://www.hostmonsterreview.org/">hostmonster</a></strong></a>, <a href="http://www.ixwebhostingreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>ixwebhosting</strong></a>,  <a href="http://www.lunarpagesreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>lunarpages</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.bluehostreview.org/" target="_self"><strong><a title="bluehost" href="http://www.bluehostreview.org/">bluehost</a></strong></a>, <a href="http://www.webhostingpadreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>webhostingpad</strong></a>,  <strong><a href="http://www.fastdomainreview.org/" target="_self">fastdomain</a></strong>, <a href="http://www.powwebreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>powweb</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.dot5hostingreviews.org/" target="_self"><strong>dot5 hosting</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.ipowerwebreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>ipower</strong></a>,  <a href="http://www.eukhostreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>eukhost</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.a2hostingreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>a2 hosting</strong></a> etc.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a title="Site5 Uptime" href="http://www.site5review.org/site5.php" target="_self"><img class="aligncenter" title="Site5 Uptime" src="http://www.site5review.org/images/site5-uptime-november-2008.gif" alt="" width="584" height="689" /></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.site5review.org/site5-uptime-for-november-2008-wwwsite5revieworg/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Site5 uptime for october 2008 &#8211; www.site5review.org</title>
		<link>http://www.site5review.org/site5-uptime-for-october-2008-wwwsite5revieworg</link>
		<comments>http://www.site5review.org/site5-uptime-for-october-2008-wwwsite5revieworg#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 11:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Site5 Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Site5 Problem]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.site5review.org/?p=89</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Site5 uptime for october 2008: 99.717% over the Internet
Last month recording at 99.8% uptime, which is good. But this month service uptime falls again, to 99.7% uptime level, with 8 service downtime occurance recorded over the month. This site5 server is responding slow as well, recording at 0.5 second of average response time.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a title="Site5 uptime" href="http://www.site5review.org/site5/site5-uptime">Site5 uptime</a> for october 2008:</strong> 99.717% over the Internet</p>
<p>Last month recording at 99.8% uptime, which is good. But this month service uptime falls again, to 99.7% uptime level, with 8 service downtime occurance recorded over the month. This <a title="site5 server" href="http://www.site5review.org/site5/site5-servers">site5 server</a> is responding slow as well, recording at 0.5 second of average response time.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a title="Site5 Uptime" href="http://www.site5review.org/site5.php" target="_self"><img class="aligncenter" title="Site5 Uptime" src="http://www.site5review.org/images/site5-uptime-october-2008.gif" alt="" width="584" height="694" /></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.site5review.org/site5-uptime-for-october-2008-wwwsite5revieworg/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Site5 uptime for july 2008 suck!</title>
		<link>http://www.site5review.org/site5-uptime-for-july-2008-suck</link>
		<comments>http://www.site5review.org/site5-uptime-for-july-2008-suck#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 14:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Site5 Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Site5 Downtime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site5 Problem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site5 Sucks?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site5 Uptime]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.site5review.org/?p=71</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Site5 uptime for july 2008: 99.56% over the Internet
site5 uptime for july 2008 really suck, recorded at 99.5% uptime level, with almost 0.5% of service downtime. Over 17 downtime/problem occurance detected over the month, and with almost 200 minutes of service downtime recorded.
The site5 server response time was slow, recorded at only 0.426 second. A [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a title="Site5 uptime" href="http://www.site5review.org/site5/site5-uptime">Site5 uptime</a> for july 2008:</strong> 99.56% over the Internet</p>
<p><a title="site5" href="http://www.site5review.org/">site5</a> uptime for july 2008 really suck, recorded at 99.5% uptime level, with almost 0.5% of service downtime. Over 17 downtime/problem occurance detected over the month, and with almost 200 minutes of service downtime recorded.</p>
<p>The <a title="site5 server" href="http://www.site5review.org/site5/site5-servers">site5 server</a> response time was slow, recorded at only 0.426 second. A really slow hosting server. Compare site5 server performance with other web hosting providers: <a href="http://www.fatcowreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>fatcow</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.hostgatorreview.org/" target="_self"><strong><a title="hostgator" href="http://www.hostgatorreview.org/">hostgator</a></strong></a>,  <a href="http://www.hostmonsterreview.org/" target="_self"><strong><a title="hostmonster" href="http://www.hostmonsterreview.org/">hostmonster</a></strong></a>, <a href="http://www.ixwebhostingreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>ixwebhosting</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.bluehostreview.org/" target="_self"><strong><a title="bluehost" href="http://www.bluehostreview.org/">bluehost</a></strong></a>, <a href="http://www.lunarpagesreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>lunarpages</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.webhostingpadreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>webhostingpad</strong></a>,  <strong><a href="http://www.fastdomainreview.org/" target="_self">fastdomain</a></strong>, <a href="http://www.powwebreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>powweb</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.eukhostreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>eukhost</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.a2hostingreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>a2 hosting</strong></a>,  <a href="http://www.dot5hostingreviews.org/" target="_self"><strong>dot5 hosting</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.ipowerwebreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>ipower</strong></a> etc.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a title="Site5 Uptime" href="http://www.site5review.org/site5.php" target="_self"><img class="aligncenter" title="Site5 Uptime" src="http://www.site5review.org/images/site5-uptime-july-2008.gif" alt="" width="582" height="689" /></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.site5review.org/site5-uptime-for-july-2008-suck/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Site5 affiliate program sucks!</title>
		<link>http://www.site5review.org/site5-affiliate-program-sucks</link>
		<comments>http://www.site5review.org/site5-affiliate-program-sucks#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 20:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Site5 Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Site5 Affiliate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site5 Problem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site5 Sucks?]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.site5review.org/?p=69</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It had been great, with $85 dollars commission when you refer your friend or anyone to site5 hosting, and when that referral is successful, you will get paid! Thats the catch. But not anymore, site5 affiliate program screw up and end up giving you a Big DONUT Now&#8230; a.k.a $0 in return!!
Well, there had been [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It had been great, with $85 dollars commission when you refer your friend or anyone to <a title="site5 hosting" href="http://www.site5review.org/site5/site5-hosting">site5 hosting</a>, and when that referral is successful, you will get paid! Thats the catch. But not anymore, <strong><a title="site5 affiliate" href="http://www.site5review.org/site5-affiliate-program-reviews">site5 affiliate</a> program screw up and end up giving you a Big DONUT Now&#8230; a.k.a $0 in return!!</strong></p>
<p>Well, there had been quit a lot of discussion <a title="site5 forum" href="http://www.site5review.org/site5/site5-forums">site5 forum</a> in the pass 4 months, and many affiliate members had forwarded their complaints to <a title="site5" href="http://www.site5review.org/">site5</a> affiliate division, and hopefully they will get paid someday soon! It had been 4 months of waiting&#8230; and waiting.. and waiting.</p>
<p>They had been blaming the system is buggy and failed to send payout to their affiliate members. Well, how hard will that be? A few lines of coding will does the trick right? why would this problem never occur months ago, and how affiliate still get paid. There must be a working version hidden somewhere. If the new codes don&#8217;t work, make it work!!! Its been 4 months of waste of time!!</p>
<p>Fellow affiliate members had spend times &amp; even money on promoting site5 hosting, and its reasonable to get them paid. Its simple as that. When you didn&#8217;t pay, you screw up everyone, and you get a bad posting like this one&#8230; everywhere.. all over the place!!!</p>
<p>Resource:<br />
<a href="http://forums.site5.com/showthread.php?t=23001&amp;page=9" target="_self">http://forums.site5.com/showthread.php?t=23001&amp;page=9</a><br />
<a href="http://weblog.site5.com/articles/2006/12/01/but-youre-so-cheap/" target="_blank">http://weblog.site5.com/articles/2006/12/01/but-youre-so-cheap/<br />
</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.site5review.org/site5-affiliate-program-sucks/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
